<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Epistech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.epistech.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.epistech.com</link>
	<description>Knowledge and Communication Technology Consulting</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Windows XP not Dead?</title>
		<link>http://www.epistech.com/2008/04/25/windows-xp-not-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.epistech.com/2008/04/25/windows-xp-not-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Rodriguez</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epistech.com/2008/04/25/windows-xp-not-dead/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reports are coming in that Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer has announced that they will consider XP&#8217;s end-of-life to be negotiable, based on customer feedback.
However, the details of that customer feedback are apparently focused on sales figures of new PCs, rather than the installed user-base that has opted (so far) not to upgrade. To my mind, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reports are coming in that Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer has announced that they will consider XP&#8217;s end-of-life to be negotiable, based on customer feedback.</p>
<p>However, the details of that customer feedback are apparently focused on sales figures of new PCs, rather than the installed user-base that has opted (so far) not to upgrade. To my mind, this makes XP&#8217;s phase-out imminent rather than just possible. On the other hand, Service Pack 3 has reached RC2 status and should be released soon. Whether this is a final hurrah, or a stepping stone to longer life remains to be seen.</p>
<p>My recommendation is to stick with XP for as long as it works for you. I was not happy with Vista (Business Edition) and would keep using XP for as long as is viable. It won&#8217;t be forever, but you don&#8217;t have to make the jump yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.epistech.com/2008/04/25/windows-xp-not-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Almost done!</title>
		<link>http://www.epistech.com/2008/02/24/almost-done/</link>
		<comments>http://www.epistech.com/2008/02/24/almost-done/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Rodriguez</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epistech.com/2008/02/24/almost-done/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The major outstanding design issues have been solved, and the implementation is proceeding nicely. It is not quite finished yet, so there&#8217;s some navigation that doesn&#8217;t work, and some dynamically generated pages that are very broken because they have not yet been implemented. One month past the projected date, but then I didn&#8217;t actually start [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The major outstanding design issues have been solved, and the implementation is proceeding nicely. It is not quite finished yet, so there&#8217;s some navigation that doesn&#8217;t work, and some dynamically generated pages that are very broken because they have not yet been implemented. One month past the projected date, but then I didn&#8217;t actually start on it until a few days ago. Not so bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.epistech.com/2008/02/24/almost-done/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Under Renovations</title>
		<link>http://www.epistech.com/2008/01/02/under-renovations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.epistech.com/2008/01/02/under-renovations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 22:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Rodriguez</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.epistech.com/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Epistech.com is currently undergoing renovations and will re-launch on or about the end of January.Thanks for staying tuned. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Epistech.com is currently undergoing renovations and will re-launch on or about the end of January.Thanks for staying tuned. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.epistech.com/2008/01/02/under-renovations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
